Thursday, November 29, 2007

Final Stock Picks and What I Plan On Doing With Them

So, at last I have a handful of companies that can be invested in. Eleven, to be exact. Well, more like eight actual "investment grade" stocks + two strong candidates + one speculative play.



Capital One is the speculative play, which as tempting as it may seem I will probably pass on. After reading a Fortune article pointing out that UK has been ahead of us by about 18 months for the past several year as far as the economic conditions go and besides the subprime mortgage that they've experienced two years ago, they've also had a problem with credit card default rates afterwards. When I thought that Capital One's stock was beaten down because of its subprime exposure, I figured that extent of the downward pricing pressure on the stock was uncalled for, but now it almost seems justified if U.S. economy will keep on following UK's behavior as it has so far.

Having said what I said above about potential credit card problems, I'm still bullish on Bank of America. It'd be a shame not to snag one of the financial companies at these beaten down share prices and this company seems to be in the better position than others with an excellent balance sheet and a limited exposure to the subprime mortage mess.

Two stocks that I'm undecided about right now are Walgreen (WAG) and 3M (MMM). I've only done financial analysis on them and not the full analysis, have not really looked at their 10-K statement yet. Walgreen has a higher margin of safety and a solid track records of revenue and profit growth. 3M, on other hand, seems to have these cyclical declines all the time and although the margin of safety is only 18%, the company, it seems to me, is likely to bounce back up quicker than Walgreen if previous stock price history is any indication. So, I might take a position in both, with 3M being the smaller investment.

Out of the remaining eight picks, only two have margin of safety (MOS) under 30%: Medtronic (MDT) at 27% and Coach (COH) at 22%. Medtronic is close enough to the 30% benchmark, while a good price for a position in Coach might be worth waiting for. Coach went up 12% since I analyzed it three weeks ago, but I'm sure it will go down before keep on going back up.

So, with the exception of Coach, other seven picks (including MDT) can be invested in. What I'm waiting for right now is the Fed meeting on December 11th, which will determine what my actual final pick will end up being and the size of positions I will take in each of those stocks. What I'm concerned about is Fed's seeming unwillingness to cut the interest rate further. If the rate is not cut once again, there is a strong belief among reputable economists, such as Ed Yardeni, that such action (or rather inaction!) will induce a recession with a significant economic downturn. I figure it's worth waiting another two weeks to see what's happening, but I would prefer to make the trades before the end of the year, this way I'd have an option of taking long-term capital gains by the end of 2008 if my tax situation will be suitable for such a move. Obviously, the trades are not made for tax reasons alone and I will most likely buy those stocks anyway, but might as well do it at the time that might be tax-advantageous in the future as well.

Here is a list of stocks listed in the spreadsheet above linked to their analysis pages:

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Stock Analysis: Harley-Davidson (HOG)

Company Description:

Harley-Davidson, Inc., incorporated in 1981, operates in two segments: the Motorcycles & Related Products segment and the Financial Services segment. The Motorcycles & Related Products segment includes the group of companies doing business as Harley-Davidson Motor Company and the group of companies doing business as Buell Motorcycle Company. The Motorcycles segment designs, manufactures and sells at wholesale primarily heavyweight (engine displacement of 651+cubic centimeters) touring, custom and performance motorcycles, as well as a line of motorcycle parts, accessories, clothing and collectibles. The Financial Services segment includes the group of companies doing business as Harley-Davidson Financial Services (HDFS). HDFS provides wholesale and retail financing and insurance programs primarily to Harley-Davidson and Buell dealers and their retail customers. HDFS conducts business in the United States, Canada and Europe.

Click here for a full description of the company’s operations (provided by Reuters).

Annual Report Highlights (latest report is for the period ending 12/30/06):

Business Overview

Harley-Davidson, Inc. was incorporated in 1981, at which time it purchased the Harley-Davidson motorcycle business from AMF Incorporated in a management buyout. In 1986, Harley-Davidson, Inc. became publicly held. The Company operates in two segments: the Motorcycles & Related Products segment and the Financial Services segment.

The Motorcycles & Related Products segment includes the group of companies doing business as Harley-Davidson Motor Company and the group of companies doing business as Buell Motorcycle Company. The Motorcycles segment designs, manufactures and sells at wholesale primarily heavyweight (engine displacement of 651+cc) touring, custom and performance motorcycles as well as a complete line of motorcycle parts, accessories, clothing and collectibles. The Company, which is the only major American motorcycle manufacturer, has had the largest share of the United States heavyweight (651+cc) motorcycle market since 1986. During 2006, the Company’s market share, based on retail registrations of new Harley-Davidson motorcycles, was 49.3% in the United States (data provided by the Motorcycle Industry Council).

The Financial Services segment includes the group of companies doing business as Harley-Davidson Financial Services (HDFS). HDFS provides wholesale and retail financing and insurance programs primarily to Harley-Davidson and Buell dealers and their retail customers. HDFS conducts business in the United States, Canada and Europe.

Motorcycles and Related Products

Motorcycles

The primary business of the Motorcycles segment is to design and manufacture premium motorcycles for the heavyweight market and sell them at wholesale. The Company is best known for its Harley-Davidson motorcycle products, but also offers a line of motorcycles and related products under the Buell brand name. The Company’s worldwide motorcycle sales generated approximately 80% of the total net revenue in the Motorcycles segment during each of the years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Motor Company’s Harley-Davidson branded motorcycle products emphasize traditional styling, design simplicity, durability and quality. The Motor Company manufactures five families of motorcycles: Touring, Dyna™, Softail, Sportster, and VRSC™. The first four of these motorcycle families are powered by an air-cooled, twin-cylinder engine with a 45-degree “V” configuration. The VRSC family is powered by a liquid-cooled, twin-cylinder engine with a 60-degree “V” configuration. The Motor Company’s Harley-Davidson engines range in size from 883cc’s to 1800cc’s.

The Motor Company’s 2007 model year line up includes 35 models of Harley-Davidson heavyweight motorcycles, with domestic manufacturer’s suggested retail prices ranging from $6,595 to $20,195. The Motor Company also offers limited-edition, factory-custom motorcycles through its Custom Vehicle Operation (CVO) program. Motorcycles sold through the CVO program are available in limited quantities and offer unique features, paint schemes and accessories. The Motor Company currently has four motorcycle model offerings available through the CVO program with domestic manufacturer’s suggested retail prices ranging from $24,995 to $33,495.

The average U.S. retail purchaser of a new Harley-Davidson motorcycle is a married male in his mid-forties (two-thirds of these purchasers are between the ages of 35 and 54) with a median household income of approximately $81,700. These customers generally purchase a motorcycle for recreational purposes rather than to provide transportation. Nearly two-thirds of the U.S. retail sales of new Harley-Davidson motorcycles are to buyers with at least one year of education beyond high school and 30% of the buyers have college degrees. Approximately 12% of U.S. retail motorcycle sales of new Harley-Davidson motorcycles are to female buyers. (Source: 2006 Company studies)

The Company’s Buell motorcycle products emphasize innovative design, responsive handling and overall performance. Buell currently manufactures and sells ten models, including nine heavyweight models in its XB family, and the Blast. The Buell XB motorcycles focus on superior handling and are powered by either a 984cc (XB9) or a 1203cc (XB12) air-cooled, twin-cylinder engine with a 45-degree “V” configuration. The Buell XB motorcycle models have domestic manufacturer’s suggested retail prices ranging from $8,895 to $11,495. During 2006, Buell produced a limited production “race-only” motorcycle (XBRR) powered by a 1339cc air-cooled, 45-degree twin cylinder boasting a peak output rating of over 150 horsepower. The XBRR domestic manufacturer’s suggested retail price is $30,995. The Buell Blast is smaller and less expensive than the Buell XB models and is powered by a 492cc single-cylinder engine. The Blast, which competes in the standard market segment, has a domestic manufacturer’s suggested retail price of $4,695.

Buell attracts customers in the demographic age range of 25 to 55. The average U.S. retail purchaser of a new Buell XB motorcycle is a male at the age of 42 with a household income of approximately $94,800. Approximately 3% of all new Buell XB U.S. retail motorcycle sales are to females. The average U.S. retail purchaser of a new Buell Blast is at the age of 41, with nearly one-half of them being female. Half of new Buell Blast purchasers have never owned a motorcycle before and 95% of them had never owned a Buell motorcycle before. (Source: 2006 Company studies)

The total motorcycle market, including the heavyweight portion of the market, is comprised of the following four segments:

  • standard (emphasizes simplicity and cost)
  • performance (emphasizes handling and acceleration)
  • custom (emphasizes styling and individual owner customization)
  • touring (emphasizes comfort and amenities for long-distance travel)

The touring segment of the heavyweight market was pioneered by the Company and includes the Harley-Davidson Touring family of motorcycles which are equipped with fairings, windshields, saddlebags and Tour Pak luggage carriers. The custom segment of the market includes motorcycles featuring the distinctive styling associated with classic Harley-Davidson motorcycles and includes the Company’s Dyna, Softail, VRSC and Sportster families of motorcycles. The standard and performance segments of the market are served primarily by the Company’s Buell motorcycle line.

In the United States, suggested retail prices for the Company’s Harley-Davidson motorcycles range from being comparable to 50% higher than suggested retail prices for comparable motorcycles available in the market. Although there are some differences in accessories between the Company’s top-of-the line touring motorcycles and those of its competitors, suggested retail prices for these motorcycles are generally comparable. The Company’s larger-displacement custom motorcycles (Dyna, Softail and VRSC) represent its highest unit volumes. The Company believes its larger-displacement custom products continue to command a premium price because of the features, styling and higher resale value associated with Harley-Davidson custom products. The Company’s smallest displacement custom motorcycle (the 883cc Sportster) is price competitive with comparable motorcycles available in the market.

The Company’s 2006 surveys of retail purchasers in the United States indicate that three-quarters of the retail purchasers of its Sportster models either have previously owned competitive-brand motorcycles or are completely new to the sport of motorcycling. The Company expects to see sales of its Sportster models lead to future sales of its higher-priced models.

Since 1988, the Company’s research has consistently shown that retail purchasers of new Harley-Davidson motorcycles in the United States have a repurchase intent at or in excess of 90%. Research completed by the Company in 2006 shows that approximately 52% of all retail purchasers of new Harley-Davidson motorcycles in the United States had previously owned a Harley-Davidson motorcycle.

Marketing

The Company’s products are marketed to retail customers primarily through dealer promotions, customer events and advertising through national television, print, radio and direct mailings, as well as internet advertising. Many of the Company’s marketing efforts are accomplished through a cooperative program with its independent dealers. The Company also sponsors racing activities and special promotional events and participates in many major motorcycle consumer shows and rallies.

On an ongoing basis, the Company promotes its products and the related lifestyle through the Harley Owners Group, or H.O.G. H.O.G. has over one million members worldwide and is the industry’s largest company-sponsored motorcycle enthusiast organization. The Company formed the Harley Owners Group in 1983 in an effort to encourage Harley-Davidson owners to become more actively involved in the sport of motorcycling. This group also sponsors many motorcycle events, including worldwide rallies and rides for Harley-Davidson motorcycle enthusiasts.

International Sales

The Company’s revenue from the sale of motorcycles and related products to independent dealers and distributors located outside of the United States was approximately $1.18 billion, $1.04 billion and $917.3 million, or approximately 20%, 19% and 18% of net revenue of the Motorcycles segment, during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Seasonality

Over the last several years the Company has been working to increase the availability of its motorcycles at dealers to improve the customer experience. The Company believes that increased availability results in independent dealers providing wider selections of motorcycles at manufacturer’s suggested retail prices which in turn has a positive impact on the customer experience and better positions the Company to attract retail buyers that are new to the brand or new to the sport of motorcycling. As a result of improving the availability of its motorcycles to customers, the timing of retail purchases is now tracking more closely with the riding season, requiring the Company and its independent dealers to balance the economies of level production with a more seasonal retail sales pattern.

In general, the Motor Company has not experienced similar seasonal fluctuations in its wholesale sales. The Company’s independent dealers typically build their inventory levels in the late fall and winter in anticipation of the spring and summer selling seasons. The availability of floor plan financing helps allow dealers to manage these seasonal increases in inventory. The Company also offers financing assistance to its dealers in the United States as a way to manage seasonal increases in inventory.

Competition

The heavyweight (651+cc) motorcycle market is highly competitive. The Company’s major competitors are based outside the U.S. and generally have financial and marketing resources that are substantially greater than those of the Company. They also have larger worldwide revenue and are more diversified than the Company and compete in all four segments of the market. In addition to these larger, established competitors, the Company has competitors headquartered in the United States. These competitors generally offer heavyweight motorcycles with traditional styling that compete directly with many of the Company’s products. These competitors currently have production and sales volumes that are lower than the Company’s and have considerably lower domestic market share than the Company.

Competition in the heavyweight motorcycle market is based upon a number of factors, including price, quality, reliability, styling, product features, customer preference and warranties. The Company emphasizes quality, reliability and styling in its products and offers a two-year warranty for its motorcycles. The Company regards its support of the motorcycling lifestyle in the form of events, rides, rallies and H.O.G. and its financing through HDFS as competitive advantages. In general, the Company believes that resale values for used Harley-Davidson motorcycles, measured by reflecting the used motorcycle price as a percentage of the manufacturer’s suggested retail price when new, are higher than resale values for used motorcycles of its competitors.

Domestically, the Company competes most heavily in the touring and custom segments of the heavyweight motorcycle market. According to the Motorcycle Industry Council, these segments accounted for 79%, 80% and 79% of total heavyweight retail unit registrations in the United States during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The larger-displacement custom and touring motorcycles are generally the most expensive vehicles in the market and the most profitable for the Company. During 2006, the heavyweight portion of the market represented approximately 53% of the total U.S. motorcycle market (on- and off-highway motorcycles and scooters) in terms of new units registered.

For the last 19 years, the Company has led the industry in the United States for retail unit registrations of new heavyweight motorcycles. The Company’s (Harley-Davidson motorcycles only) share of the heavyweight market was 49.3% and 48.9% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. This share is significantly greater than that of the Company’s largest competitor in the domestic market which had a 15.1% market share in 2006.

Research and Development

The Company believes research and development are significant factors in its ability to lead the custom and touring motorcycling market and to develop products for the performance segment.

The Company’s Product Development Center (PDC) brings employees from styling, purchasing and manufacturing together with regulatory professionals and supplier representatives to create a concurrent product and process development team. The Company incurred research and development expenses of $177.7 million, $178.5 million and $170.7 million during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, the Motorcycles segment had approximately 9,000 employees. Unionized employees at the motorcycle manufacturing facilities in Wauwatosa and Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin and Kansas City, Missouri are represented by the United Steelworkers of America (USW), as well as the International Association of Machinist and Aerospace Workers (IAM). Unionized employees at the distribution and manufacturing facilities in Franklin and Tomahawk, Wisconsin are represented by the USW. Production workers at the motorcycle manufacturing facility in York, Pennsylvania are represented by the IAM. The collective bargaining agreement with the Pennsylvania-IAM will expire on February 2, 2010, the collective bargaining agreement with the Kansas City-USW and IAM will expire on August 1, 2007, and the collective bargaining agreement with the Wisconsin-USW and IAM will expire on March 31, 2008.

Financial Services

HDFS is engaged in the business of financing and servicing wholesale inventory receivables and consumer retail loans (primarily for the purchase of motorcycles). Additionally, HDFS is an agent for certain unaffiliated insurance carriers providing property/casualty insurance and also sells extended service contracts, gap coverage and debt protection products to motorcycle owners. HDFS conducts business in the United States, Canada and Europe.

Harley-Davidson and Buell

Operating under the trade name Harley-Davidson Credit, HDFS provides wholesale financial services to Harley-Davidson and Buell dealers and retail financing to consumers. Operating under the trade name Harley-Davidson Insurance, HDFS is an agent for the sale of motorcycle insurance policies and also sells extended service warranty agreements, gap contracts and debt protection products.

Wholesale financial services include floorplan and open account financing of motorcycles and motorcycle parts and accessories. HDFS offers wholesale financial services to Harley-Davidson dealers in the U.S., Canada and Europe and during 2006, approximately 97% of such dealers utilized those services. Prior to August 2002, HDFS offered wholesale financing to some of the Company’s European motorcycle dealers through a joint venture with Transamerica Distribution Finance. In August 2002, HDFS terminated this joint venture relationship and began directly serving the wholesale financing needs of some European dealers. The wholesale finance operations of HDFS are located in Plano, Texas and Oxford, England.

Competition

The Company regards its ability to offer a package of wholesale and retail financial services as a significant competitive advantage for HDFS. Competitors compete for business based largely on price and, to a lesser extent, service. HDFS competes based on convenience, service, brand association, dealer relations, industry experience, terms and price.

During 2006, HDFS financed 48% of the new Harley-Davidson motorcycles retailed by independent dealers in the United States, as compared to 45% in 2005. Competitors for retail motorcycle finance business are primarily banks, credit unions and other financial institutions. In the motorcycle insurance business, competition primarily comes from national insurance companies and from insurance agencies serving local or regional markets. For insurance-related products such as extended service contracts, HDFS faces competition from certain regional and national industry participants as well as dealer in-house programs.

Seasonality

In the northern United States and Canada, motorcycles are primarily used during warmer months. Accordingly, HDFS experiences seasonal variations. From mid-March through August, retail financing volume increases and wholesale financing volume decreases as dealer inventories decline. From September through mid-March, there is a decrease in retail financing volume while dealer inventories build and turn over more slowly, substantially increasing wholesale finance receivables.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, the Financial Services segment had approximately 704 employees. No employees of HDFS are represented by labor unions.

Risk Factors

  • The Company has a number of competitors of varying sizes that are based both inside and outside the United States some of which have greater financial resources than the Company.
  • The Company’s marketing strategy of associating its motorcycle products with a motorcycling lifestyle may not be successful with future customers.
  • Company’s success depends upon the continued strength of the Harley-Davidson brand.
  • The Company’s prospects for future growth are largely dependent upon its ability to develop and successfully introduce new, innovative and compliant products.
  • The Company’s Motorcycles segment is dependent upon unionized labor.
  • The Company’s operations are dependent upon attracting and retaining skilled employees.
  • The Company incurs substantial costs with respect to pension benefits and providing healthcare for its employees.
  • The Company manufactures products that create exposure to product liability claims and litigation.
  • The Company sells its products at wholesale and must rely on a network of independent dealers and distributors to manage the retail distribution of its products.
  • The Company and its independent dealers must balance the economies of level production with a more seasonal retail sales pattern.
  • The Company relies on third party suppliers to obtain raw materials and provide component parts for use in the manufacture of its motorcycles.
  • The Company must maintain its reputation of being a good corporate citizen and treating customers, employees, suppliers and other stakeholders fairly.
  • The Company must invest in and successfully implement new information systems and technology.
  • The Company is the defendant in several class action and similar lawsuits.
  • There is a Securities and Exchange Commission inquiry relating to the Company.
  • The Company must comply with governmental laws and regulations that are subject to change and involve significant costs.
  • Breaches of security involving consumers’ personal data could adversely affect the Company’s reputation, revenue and earnings.
  • The Company’s financial services operations are highly dependent on accessing capital markets to fund its operations at attractive interest rates.
  • The Company’s financial services operations are exposed to credit risk on its retail and wholesale receivables, receivables held for sale, and its investment in retained securitization interests.
  • The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates.
Properties

The Company has eight facilities that perform manufacturing operations: Wauwatosa and Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin (motorcycle powertrain production); Tomahawk, Wisconsin (fiberglass/plastic parts production and painting); York, Pennsylvania (motorcycle parts fabrication, painting and Softail and touring model assembly); Kansas City, Missouri (motorcycle parts fabrication, painting and Dyna Glide, Sportster and VRSC assembly); East Troy, Wisconsin (Buell motorcycle assembly); Manaus, Brazil (assembly of select models for Brazilian market); and Adelaide, Australia (motorcycle wheel production).

The Financial Services segment has four office facilities: Chicago, Illinois (corporate headquarters); Plano, Texas (wholesale, insurance and retail operations); Carson City, Nevada (retail and insurance operations); and Oxford, England (European wholesale operations). Corporate headquarters will be moving into a new office in February 2007.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Position and Results of Operations

Overview

The Company’s net revenue for 2006 was $5.80 billion, up 8.6% over 2005 driven by a 6.1% increase in shipments of Harley-Davidson motorcycles over 2005. Net income and diluted earnings per share for 2006 were up 8.7% and 15.2%, respectively, over 2005. The increase in diluted earnings per share includes the benefit of fewer weighted-average shares outstanding when compared to the prior year. Weighted-average shares outstanding were lower in 2006 than in 2005 as a result of the Company’s repurchases of common stock occurring over the last two years.

The Company’s independent dealer network also reported growth over prior year with increases in retail motorcycle unit sales during 2006. Worldwide dealer retail sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles were up 8.5% in 2006 over 2005. In the United States, retail sales of Harley-Davidson motorcycles grew 5.9% during 2006 when compared to the prior year. Internationally, retail sales were up 18.6% over 2005 with increases of 14.6% in Europe, 16.3% in Japan and 15.9% in Canada.

Retail sales growth during 2006 was due in part to a positive worldwide response to the Company’s new 2007 models. In July 2006, independent dealers began offering the Company’s new 2007 model year motorcycles. The Company’s 2007 model offering includes the new larger Twin Cam 96 engine and a new six-speed transmission for all Touring and Softail motorcycles, the addition of electronic fuel injection on all Sportster models and a number of new models and features.

Outlook

The Company’s collective bargaining agreement with the Pennsylvania-IAM (Union) covering approximately 2,800 workers at its assembly plant in York, Pennsylvania expired on February 2, 2007. Prior to the expiration of that contract the union voted to reject a proposed new collective bargaining agreement for employees and authorized a strike which began immediately following the expiration of the contract. On February 22, 2007, the Company reached a new agreement with the Union, ending the strike. The new contract with the York Union employees is a three-year agreement expiring in February 2010.

The Company is pleased with the agreement it has reached with its York Union employees. However, the disruption caused by the strike had a significant impact on the Company’s business. As a result of the strike, the Company lost approximately four weeks of production at its York, Pennsylvania assembly facility and interrupted production at some of the Company’s other manufacturing locations. The strike also adversely impacted its suppliers and employees and may adversely impact its independent dealers and retail customers.

As a result of the strike and its related impact, the Company will not meet previously announced guidance for 2007. First quarter 2007 shipments of Harley-Davidson motorcycles had been expected to be between 82,000 and 84,000 units. The Company has lowered its target range by 18,000 units, and now expects first quarter shipments of Harley-Davidson motorcycles to be between 64,000 and 66,000 units. Over the remainder of 2007, the Company expects to make up approximately 4,000 to 5,000 of these motorcycle shipments, resulting in full year shipment plans for approximately 14,000 fewer motorcycles than originally planned. The Company arrived at this decision after carefully evaluating its production constraints, supply chain issues, cost implications, timing of shipments to dealers and the delayed start of 2008 model year production caused by the strike.

The Company’s revised plan for 2007 does not affect its previously stated plan to continue to grow revenue, although revenue growth in 2007 as a result of the strike is expected to be moderate. The Company continues to believe that shipments in its international markets will grow at a faster rate than in the U.S. market. The Company’s growth will be driven by a focus on providing customers around the world with a continuous stream of exciting new motorcycles, surrounded by the unique Harley-Davidson experience. Harley-Davidson customers enjoy a unique lifestyle experience through organized rides and rallies, through membership in the Harley Owners Group (H.O.G.) organization, and through the use of MotorClothes merchandise and Harley-Davidson Genuine Motor Accessories to personalize their experience.

In 2007, the Company will experience inefficiencies and costs associated with the strike and the related make-up plan which will have a negative impact on margins. Therefore, for 2007 the Company has revised its previous guidance of increasing margins and believes 2007 margins will be lower than margins experienced in 2006. The Company believes its manufacturing expertise and focus on operational excellence, and other factors, position it to continue to drive a net income growth rate in 2008 and 2009 that will be in excess of its revenue growth rate.

Operational excellence involves employees and suppliers continuously pursuing process improvements and innovation. Over the last several years, the Company has made considerable strides in manufacturing efficiency and automation and believes there continue to be opportunities for improvement in these areas and across other parts of the organization. The Company also expects that other factors such as increased production, quality, product mix and pricing for features will continue to have a positive impact on margins.

Prior to the strike, the Company had expected to deliver earnings-per-share growth of 11% to 17% annually through 2009 driven by solid revenue growth, margin improvement and the benefits of strong free cash flow. However, as a result of the strike and its related impact to the business in 2007, the Company has revised its expected earnings-per-share growth rate for 2007 to be in the range of 4% to 6%. The Company expects its earnings-per-share growth rate to return to 11% to 17% in 2008 and 2009.

Results of Operations 2006 Compared to 2005

Motorcycle Unit Shipments and Net Revenue

During 2006, the Company shipped 349,196 Harley-Davidson motorcycles, an increase of 20,179 or 6.1%, over 2005 shipments. International shipments grew faster than U.S. shipments with an increase of 21.6% in 2006, compared to a 2006 U.S. shipment increase of 2.5%. As a result, international shipments represented 21.8% of total Harley-Davidson wholesale shipments in 2006, compared to 19.0% in 2005. The increase in international shipments as a percentage of total shipments is consistent with the Company’s expectation that international growth will outpace domestic shipment growth.

During 2006, net revenue for the Motorcycles segment grew 8.6% or $458.5 million over 2005. Approximately $350 million of the increase in net revenue from 2005 to 2006 resulted from the higher shipment volumes of motorcycles and related products. Net revenue also benefited during 2006 from a favorable change in product mix and wholesale price increases. The changes to product mix occurring in 2006 resulted in approximately $70 million of higher revenue and related primarily to an increase in the percentage of shipments consisting of higher-priced touring motorcycles. Touring motorcycles made up 35.4% of shipments in 2006 compared to 33.5% in 2005. During 2006, wholesale price increases on Harley-Davidson motorcycles resulted in approximately $45 million of higher revenue when compared to 2005. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates resulted in approximately $10 million of lower net revenue during 2006 when compared to 2005.

Gross Profit

Gross profit was $2.23 billion for the Motorcycles segment during 2006, an increase of $192.3 million or 9.4% over gross profit in 2005. Gross profit margin for 2006 was 38.5% compared to 38.3% during 2005. During 2006, the increase in gross margin was due primarily to wholesale price increases on Harley-Davidson motorcycles, favorable Harley-Davidson motorcycle product mix and favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Financial Services

During 2006, HDFS sold $2.33 billion in retail motorcycle loans through securitization transactions resulting in gains of $32.3 million. This compares with gains of $46.6 million on $2.48 billion of loans securitized during 2005. The 2006 gain as a percentage of loans sold was 1.4% as compared to 1.9% for 2005. The 2006 gain as a percentage of the amount of loans securitized was lower than the prior year due to rising market interest rates and the competitive environment for motorcycle lending.

Stock Repurchasing

During 2006, the Company repurchased 19.3 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $1.06 billion. The Company repurchased 17.2 million shares under a general authorization received from the Company’s Board of Directors in 2005. The remaining 2.1 million shares were repurchased under an authorization from the Company’s Board of Directors that is designed to provide the Company with continuing authority to repurchase shares to offset dilution caused by the exercise of stock options.

In October 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors separately authorized the Company to buy back up to 20.0 million shares of its common stock with no dollar limit or expiration date. No repurchases had been made under this authorization as of the end of 2006.

During 2005 and 2004, the Company repurchased 21.4 million and 10.6 million shares, respectively, of its common stock at a total cost of $1.05 billion and $564.1 million, respectively.

Dividends

The Company paid total dividends of $0.81, $0.625 and $0.405 per share during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, at a total cost of $212.9 million, $173.8 million and $119.2 million, respectively.

Financial Highlights:

Revenue Growth (1-yr): 9.0%
Revenue Growth (9-yr average): 15.1%

Net Income Growth (1-yr): 8.6%
Net Income Growth (9-yr average): 22.3%

Earnings-Per-Share Growth (1-yr): 15.2%
Earnings-Per-Share (9-yr average): 24.1%

Free Cash Flow Growth (1-yr): (29.0%)
Free Cash Flow Growth (9-yr average): 22.2%

Net Profit Margin (current): 16.9%
Net Profit Margin (10-yr average): 13.5%

Return On Equity (current): 35.7%
Return On Equity (10-yr average): 29.8%

Debt Ratio (current): 0.50
Current Ratio (current): 2.22

Financial analysis:

  • Company’s debt ratio has stayed fairly consistent throughout the past decade and currently stands at 0.50.
  • ROA has also been consistent throughout the past ten years, hovering around the high teens. Currently it stands at 19.1% and 10-yr average is 16.3%.
  • ROE is pretty impressive and has consistently been improving: from 22.9% in 1998 to 35.7% in the 2006 fiscal year; 10-yr average is 29.8%.
  • All margins (gross margin, operating margin, and net profit margin) have significantly improved over the past ten years. Profit margin is currently at 16.9% and company posted a 13.5% 10-yr average.
  • Revenue growth has stayed positive, but it did slow down in the past few years. Nevertheless, the company posted solid growth of 9.0% in 2006 and averaged 15.1% over the past nine years.
  • Net income growth was very impressive in the recent past: between 1997 and 2003 the company had growth in the mid-twenties and low-thirties. More recently though, net income growth has slowed down in tandem with the revenue growth figures. The company posted net income growth of 8.6% in the 2006 fiscal year and 9-yr average is 22.3%.
  • Free Cash Flow margin is decent at 8.8%. During the past decade FCF margin has stayed relatively consistent in the high single digits and low teens. FCF growth, on the other hand, has not been all that consistent: growth was negative in 2002 and 2006, (2.4%) and (29%), respectively. However, average growth for the past nine years stands at the impressive 22.2%.
  • Improved inventory management has cut down average days sales by almost a third: from 36 days nine years ago to 25 days in 2006. Inventory Turnover ratio has increased from 10.02 in 1998 to 14.70 in 2006.

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis:

I used discounted cash flow analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of the company. I estimated that free cash flow would grow at an average rate of 12% per year for the next 10 years and at 3% (trailing GDP growth) perpetually after that. The company’s free cash flow grew at an average rate of 22% during the past nine years, which makes my estimate fairly conservative.

I used a discount rate of 9.5% because Harley-Davidson is a mature company with an established franchise and therefore it commands a below-average discount rate.

Using the assumptions listed above, my intrinsic value of the stock came out to $69.89. My intrinsic value of Harley-Davidson is abut 15% higher than what Morningstar has as a “fair value” for this company. I believe our difference in opinion lies in the fact that Morningstar underestimates this company’s growth potential.

Pros:

  • Harley-Davidson brand is of a rare breed that not many companies can boast. It can command premium pricing through strong brand recognition.
  • The company has had early success with international sales. Currently 22% of units sold are shipped internationally.
  • Harley-Davidson continues to consistently buy back its common stock year after year, which boosts earnings-per-share and subsequently share values.
  • The company is in great financial health with virtual zero net debt, which means it can weather an economic downturn just fine.

Cons:

  • Harley-Davidson’s core consumer group is aging and it’s unclear whether it will be as successful with the younger generation of motorcycle enthusiasts.
  • The company’s financial business is affected by the turmoil in the credit markets and profits are likely to slim down in this unit.
  • If there is an economic recession, Harley-Davidson would feel its effects since consumers tend to tighten up discretionary spending during rough times.

Final Decision:

This company has one of the most recognized brands in the world and a solid business model with a network of exclusive dealers. Currently, HOG’s stock trades at $47 vs. $.70 that I have for the intrinsic value of the company. Given my safety margin of 30-50%, it is within my buying price range $35-$49. I’m very excited about this company and although its prospects for the near future are modest, the price certainly doesn’t reflect this company’s worth. I’m certainly adding Harley-Davidson to the list of my final picks.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Stock Analysis: Fastenal (FAST)

Company Description:

Fastenal Company (Fastenal), incorporated in 1968, sells industrial and construction supplies in a wholesale and retail fashion. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had 2,000 store sites located in 50 states, Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, Singapore, China and the Netherlands. As of December 31, 2006, Fastenal operated 12 distribution centers in North America, from which it distributed products to its store sites. Fastenal's offerings are grouped into 10 product lines: fasteners; tools and equipment; cutting tools and abrasives; hydraulics, pneumatics, plumbing, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC); material handling, storage and packaging; janitorial supplies, chemicals and paints; electrical supplies; welding supplies; safety supplies, and metals, alloys and materials. Fastenal conducts business under various trademarks and service marks, including Fastenal with various designs or tag lines, FAS-N-IT, FNL, Blackstone and FNL G9.

Click here for a full description of the company’s operations (provided by Reuters).

Annual Report Highlights (latest report is for the period ending 12/30/06):

Business Overview

Fastenal Company was founded in 1967. As of December 31, 2006, we operated 2,000 store sites located in 50 states, Puerto Rico, Canada, Mexico, Singapore, China, and the Netherlands and employed 7,174 people at these sites. In addition, there were 3,241 people employed in various support positions.

We sell approximately 689,000 different types of industrial and construction supplies in ten product categories. These include (approximately): 306,000 different types of threaded fasteners and miscellaneous supplies (fasteners); 110,000 different types of tools and equipment (tools); 127,000 different types of cutting tool blades and abrasives (cutting tools); 47,000 different types of fluid transfer components and accessories for hydraulic power, pneumatic power, plumbing, and HVAC (hydraulics & pneumatics); 9,000 different types of material handling, storage, and packaging products (material handling); 12,000 different types of janitorial supplies, chemicals, and paint (janitorial supplies); 24,000 different types of electrical supplies; 26,000 different types of welding supplies (excluding welding gases); 19,000 different types of safety supplies; and 9,000 different types of metals, alloys, and materials (metals).

As of December 31, 2006, we operated twelve distribution centers located in Minnesota, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Georgia, Washington, California, Utah, North Carolina, Kansas, and Ontario, Canada. Approximately 94.8% of our 2006 sales were attributable to products manufactured by others, and approximately 5.2% related to items manufactured, modified, or repaired by either our Manufacturing Division or one of our Support Services.

Stores

We have closed only ten stores in our history. Three of these locations were subsequently reopened when the expansion of our product line or the expansion of our distribution network improved the profitability of the locations.

We select new locations for our stores based on their proximity to our distribution network, population statistics, and employment data for manufacturing and construction. We intend to continue opening new store sites and currently expect the rate of new store openings to be approximately 13% to 18% per year (calculated on the ending number of stores in the previous year).

We believe, based on the demographics of the marketplace in North America, that there is sufficient potential in this geographic area to support at least 3,500 total stores. Many of the new store sites may be in cities in which we currently operate. Fastenal has not operated outside of North America long enough to assess the market potential of those markets.

We also operate “in-plant” sites. An “in-plant” site is a selling unit located in or near a customer’s facility that sells product solely to that customer. These sites are not included in the store count numbers as they represent a customer subset of a store.

We plan to open additional store sites outside of the United States in the future. The store sites located outside the United States contributed approximately 7% of our consolidated net sales in 2006 with approximately 78% of this amount attributable to our Canadian operations.

It has been our experience that near-term profitability has been adversely affected by the opening of new store sites. This adverse effect is due to the start-up costs and the time necessary to generate a customer base. A new store generates its sales from direct sales calls, a slow process involving repeated contacts. As a result of this process, sales volume builds slowly and it typically requires nine to 12 months for a new store to achieve its first profitable month. Of the 73 stores opened in the first quarter of 2006, 32 were profitable in the fourth quarter of 2006.

We operate a central UNIX/terminal-based computer system allowing automatic data exchange between our stores and our distribution centers. This system consists of both customized and purchased software. The use of client/server technology allows our network of UNIX-based machines to serve networked personal computers and workstations and is provided to authorized users via a dedicated Wide Area Network (WAN). At the store level, we operate a proprietary point-of-sale (POS) system that operates on a Microsoft Windows operating system. The data exchange between the centrally located systems and POS is monitored and controlled centrally.

Products

Our original product offerings were fasteners and other industrial and construction supplies, many of which are sold under the Fastenal product name. This product line, which we refer to as the fastener product line, consists of two broad categories: threaded fasteners, such as bolts, nuts, screws, studs, and related washers; and miscellaneous supplies, such as paints, various pins and machinery keys, concrete anchors, batteries, sealants, metal framing systems, wire rope, strut, private-label stud anchors, rivets, and related accessories.

Threaded fasteners are used in most manufactured products and building projects, and in the maintenance and repair of machines and structures. Many aspects of the threaded fastener market are common to all cities. Variations from city to city that do exist typically relate to the types of businesses operating in a market or to the environmental conditions in a market. Therefore, we open each store with a broad selection of base stocks of inventory and then allow the local store and district leaders to tailor the additional inventory to the local market demand as it develops.

Threaded fasteners accounted for approximately 90% of the fastener product line sales in 2006, 2005, and 2004 and approximately 46%, 48%, and 50% of our consolidated net sales in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Concrete anchors make up the largest portion of the miscellaneous supply items included in the fastener product line. Most concrete anchors use threaded fasteners as part of the completed anchor assembly.

Since 1993, we have added additional product lines. These product lines are sold through the same distribution channel as the original fastener product line.

Inventory Control

Our inventory stocking levels are determined using our computer systems, our sales personnel at the store, district, and region levels, and our product managers. The data used for this determination is derived from sales activity from all of our stores, from individual stores, and from geographic areas. It is also derived from vendor information and from customer demographic information. The computer system monitors the inventory level for all stock items and triggers replenishment, or prompts a buyer to purchase, as necessary, based on an established minimum-maximum level. All stores stock a base inventory and may expand beyond preset inventory levels as deemed appropriate by their district managers. Inventories in distribution centers are established from computerized data for the stores served by the respective centers.

Manufacturing and Support Services Operations

In 2006, approximately 94.8% of our consolidated net sales were attributable to products manufactured by other companies to industry standards. The remaining 5.2% of our consolidated net sales for 2006 related to products manufactured, modified or repaired by our manufacturing division or our support services. The manufactured products consist primarily of non-standard sizes of threaded fasteners made to customers’ specifications. The services provided by the support services group include, but are not limited to, items such as tool repair, band saw blade welding, third-party logistics, and light manufacturing. We engage in these activities primarily as a service to our customers and expect these activities in the future to continue to contribute in the range of 4% to 10% of our consolidated net sales.

Sources of Supply

We use a large number of suppliers for the approximately 689,000 standard stock items we distribute. Most items distributed by our network can be purchased from several sources, although preferred sourcing is used for some stock items to facilitate quality control. No single supplier accounted for more than 5% of our purchases in 2006.

Customers and Marketing

We believe our success can be attributed to our ability to offer customers a full line of quality products at convenient locations, and to the superior service orientation and expertise of our employees. Most of our customers are in the construction and manufacturing markets. The construction market includes general, electrical, plumbing, sheet metal, and road contractors.

The manufacturing market includes both original equipment manufacturers and maintenance and repair operations. Other users of our products include farmers, truckers, railroads, mining companies, federal, state and local governmental entities, schools, and certain retail trades. As of December 31, 2006, our total number of active customer accounts (defined as accounts having purchase activity within the last 90 days) was approximately 275,000.

During each of the three years ended December 31, 2006, no one customer accounted for a significant portion of our sales. We believe that our large number of customers together with the varied markets that they represent, provide some protection to us from economic downturns in a particular market.

Store personnel generate a significant portion of our sales through direct calls on customers. Because of the nature of our business, we make limited use of the more expensive forms of mass media advertising such as television, radio, and newspapers. The forms of advertising we use include signs, catalogs, and direct mailings.

Competition

Our business is highly competitive. Competitors include both large distributors located primarily in large cities and smaller distributors located in many of the same cities in which we have stores. We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting the markets for our products are customer service and convenience.

Some competitors use vans to sell their products in markets away from their main warehouses, while others rely on mail order or telemarketing sales. We, however, believe that the convenience provided to customers by operating stores in small, medium, and large markets, each offering a wide variety of products, is a competitive selling advantage and that the large number of stores in a given area, taken together with our ability to provide frequent deliveries to such stores from centrally located distribution centers, makes possible the prompt and efficient distribution of products.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, we employed a total of 10,415 full and part-time employees, 7,174 being store managers and store employees, and the balance being employed in our distribution centers, manufacturing operations, service operations, and home office.

We believe the quality of our employees is critical to our ability to compete successfully in the markets we currently serve and to our ability to open new stores in new markets. We foster the growth and education of skilled employees throughout the organization by operating training programs and by decentralizing decision-making. Wherever possible, promotions are from within our organization. For example, most new store managers are promoted from an outside sales position or from an assistant manager’s position, and district managers (who supervise a number of stores) are usually former store managers.

The Fastenal School of Business develops and delivers a comprehensive array of industry and company specific education and training programs that are offered to all Fastenal employees.

Risk Factors

  • The industrial, construction, and maintenance supply industry is consolidating, which could cause it to become more competitive and could negatively impact our business.
  • Our revenues and net income may be adversely affected by economic conditions, political situations, and changing laws and regulations in foreign countries, over which we have no control.
  • We may not be able to compete effectively against our competitors, which could harm our business and operating results.
  • We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk, and changes in foreign exchange rates could increase our costs to procure products and our foreign sales.
  • Inclement weather and other disruptions to the transportation network could impact our distribution system.
  • Our ability to successfully attract and retain qualified personnel to staff our stores could impact labor costs, sales at existing stores, and the rate of new store openings.
  • Increases in energy costs and the cost of raw materials used in our products could impact our cost of goods and distribution and occupancy expenses, which may result in lower operating margins.
  • The ability to identify new products and products lines, and integrate them into our store and distribution network, may impact our ability to compete and our sales and margins.
  • New store openings may negatively impact our operating results.
  • Opening stores in new markets presents increased risks that may prevent us from being profitable in these new locations.
  • Lower volume orders and changes in our customers and product mix could cause our gross margin percentage to fluctuate or decline in the future.
  • Neither our current business strategy that focuses on stores with an industrial-leaning retail look and feel nor our new business strategy of opening certain stores with additional product selection has been proven successful on a long-term basis.
  • We may be unable to meet our goals regarding new store openings.
  • Our current estimate for total store market potential in North America could be incorrect.
  • A downturn in the economy and other factors may affect customer spending, which could harm our operating results.

Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations

Financial Overview

During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the strength of the global industrial environment positively impacted our performance. During the first half of 2003, the recession in the global industrial environment, which had begun several years earlier, negatively impacted our performance, and that of the industry as a whole.

The 2006, 2005, and 2004 net sales growth rate percentages reflect the strengthening of the North American market in the period since July 2003. The increase in net sales in 2006, 2005, and 2004 came primarily from unit sales growth in existing stores more than two years old, growth in the newer product lines, and new site openings. The 2004 growth was increased by 3.0% to 4.0% due to an inflationary increase in pricing during the year.

Stores sites opened in 2006 contributed approximately $32.9 (or 1.8%) to 2006 net sales. Store sites opened in 2005 contributed approximately $109.1 (or 6.0%) to 2006 net sales and approximately $35.5 (or 2.3%) to 2005 net sales. The rate of growth in sales of store sites generally levels off after they have been open for five years, and, as stated earlier, the sales of older store sites typically vary more with the economy than do the sales of younger store sites.

Impact of Current Initiatives

During 2006 and 2005, we have been actively pursuing several initiatives to improve our operational performance. These include: (1) a new freight model, (2) tactical changes to our working capital model, and (3) an expanded store model called CSP2.

The freight model represents a focused effort to haul a higher percentage of our products utilizing our trucking network (which operates at a substantial savings to external service providers because of our ability to leverage our existing routes) and to charge freight more consistently in our various operating units. This initiative positively impacted the latter two-thirds of 2005 and all of 2006 despite the fact we experienced year-over-year increases of approximately 31.7% and 5.3%, respectively, in per gallon diesel fuel costs during those periods.

The diesel fuel cost per gallon did soften in the last four months of 2006 as our average price per gallon dropped below $2.90. Given the nature of our distribution business, if the lower fuel prices continue, it will translate into cost savings in our business during 2007.

The tactical changes to our working capital model include the establishment of a central call center for accounts receivable collection and the establishment of financial business rules for the purchasing of products outside the standard stocking model (formerly referred to as CSP) at the store. The balance sheet impacts of these changes are described below in the working capital discussion.

The CSP2 store model represents an expansion of the core stocking items and sales personnel in an existing store with the goal of driving additional product sales to existing customers, target customers, and specific geographic areas within established markets. During 2006, 163 stores were converted to the CSP2 format (an additional, five new stores opened with the CSP2 format). This resulted in 193 stores converted to the CSP2 format since the third quarter of 2005, plus the six new stores opened with the CSP2 format. The balance sheet impacts of the CSP2 locations are described below in the working capital discussion.

Impact of Fuel Prices

Rising fuel prices did take a toll on the year ended December 31, 2006, but there was some relief in the final four months. During 2005, our total vehicle fuel costs averaged approximately $1.2, $1.5, $1.7, and $1.8 per month in the first, second, third, and fourth quarters, respectively. During 2006, total vehicle fuel costs averaged approximately $1.9, $2.1, $2.2, and $1.9 per month in the first, second, third, and fourth quarters, respectively. These changes result from variations in fuel costs, the freight initiative discussed earlier, and the increase in sales and store locations. These fuel costs include the fuel utilized in our distribution vehicles (semi-tractors, straight trucks, and sprinter trucks) which is recorded in cost of goods and the fuel utilized in our store delivery vehicles which is included in operating and administrative expenses.

Gross Profit Margins

Gross profit margins for 2006 increased over 2005. The improvement was driven by our freight initiative (discussed earlier) and by improvements in our direct sourcing operations.

Gross profit margins for 2005 and 2004 were similar. The gross margin in 2005 was reduced by the greater inflation cost in steel-based products flowing through cost of sales. This impact was expected, and reflects product costs in the last three to six month ‘turn period’ of inventory in a ‘first-in, first-out’ inventory costing model. This impact was more than offset by an improvement in the gross profit associated with net freight revenue since May 2005 and a reduction in outside freight costs in the fourth quarter of 2005 due to the freight initiatives discussed earlier.

Dividends and Stock Repurchases

We have paid dividends in every year since 1991. In June 2006, we issued a press release announcing our board of directors had authorized purchases by us of up to an additional 500,000 shares of its common stock (over and above previously authorized amounts). We purchased 474,000 shares of our outstanding stock at an average price of approximately $36.49 per share since the beginning of this repurchase plan.

On January 18, 2007, we issued a press release announcing our board of directors had authorized us to purchase up to an additional 1,000,000 shares of our common stock (over and above previously authorized amounts). With this new authorization, we have remaining authority to purchase up to 1,086,000 shares of our common stock.

Financial Highlights:

Revenue Growth (1-yr): 18.8%
Revenue Growth (9-yr average): 18.5%

Net Income Growth (1-yr): 19.2%
Net Income Growth (9-yr average): 20.8%

Earnings-Per-Share Growth (1-yr): 20.0%
Earnings-Per-Share (9-yr average): 20.5%

Net Profit Margin (current): 11.0%
Net Profit Margin (10-yr average): 10.0%

Return On Equity (current): 23.3%
Return On Equity (10-yr average): 24.4%

Debt Ratio (current): 0.11
Current Ratio (current): 7.38

Financial analysis:

  • Company’s debt ratio has stayed consistent throughout the past decade and currently stands at 0.11. This low level of leverage will allow the company to expand through acquisition if need to.
  • ROA has also been fairly consistent throughout the past ten years, hovering in the mid-teens and low twenties. Currently it stands at 20.6% and 10-yr average is 21.0%.
  • ROE has also shown consistently impressive results. Currently it’s at 23.3% and 10-yr average is 24.4%.
  • Profit margin has stayed at roughly the same level throughout the past decade. It is currently at 11.0% and company posted a 10.0% 10-yr average.
  • Revenue growth has not been very consistent in the past nine years, but it did stay positive and mostly in the double digits. Company posted growth of 18.8% in the 2006 fiscal year and averaged 18.5% over the past nine years.
  • Net income growth is as inconsistent as the revenue growth, but unlike revenue growth, it has been in the negative territory (in 2001). Most recent annual net income growth was 19.2% and 9-yr average is 20.8%.
  • Free Cash Flow figures have got to be the least impressive such figures I’ve seen so far. FCF margin has historically been very low and was negative in 1997. For the 2006 fiscal year, FCF margin stands at 1.1%. FCF growth was negative in six of the past nine years and varied between single and four (!) digit growth (or decline). So, saying that it was rocky and inconsistent isn’t saying anything. Most recent FCF growth was negative again at (-64.3%) for the 2006 fiscal year.
  • Fastenal’s Current Ratio is rather impressive at 7.38. This shows that company is currently holding a lot of cash on hand, enough to pay for the current expenses seven times over. Such high Current Ratio may suggest that company has transferred some of its assets into a more liquid form to be able to act fast on potential acquisition targets. Or, the company is simply inefficient at using its cash reserves. The latter theory seems to be more plausible given that the Current Ratio has consistently increased over the past decade from 3.79 (which is already pretty high) to the current 7.38.
  • Inventory Turnover has decreased from 2.76 nine year ago to the current 2.21. This seemingly slight change increases the time inventory spends sitting at the company’s warehouses by 34 days (from 132 days nine years ago go 166 days now). This change may indicate that as the company is growing it is losing inventory management efficiency.
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis:

I was unable to use DCF analysis to come up with any kind of meaningful valuation. Even if I were to use the highest free cash flow figures from the past nine years, the stock still wouldn’t reach over $20/share. Considering that market price is about $38/share and Morningstar’s valuating the company at about 150% the current price, I must be missing something here.

Pros:

  • Fastenal has a well-established network of stores with a proved earning potential.
  • The company has brand recognition, which provide it with the needed leverage when lending national and government accounts.
  • Fastenal plans on increasing the repurchase of its common shares, which will boost EPS.

Cons:

  • Company’s growth depends on the construction industry, which is currently in a slump.
  • Fastenal’s free cash flow margins and growth are abysmal, which make it difficult for me to value this company and doesn’t instill confidence in the future free cash flow growth.

Final Decision:

Fastenal seems to be a good company with a significant competitive advantage, but I’m not impressed by its free cash flow margin and growth, which are the best indicators of the financial quality. This company is definitely worth a look and other investors might find it quite suitable for their portfolios and a good fit for their investing styles. As for me, I will pass on this company and keep looking for companies I’m significantly confident about, which is not how I feel about Fastenal.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Morningstar StockInvestor: Seven Different Investing Perspectives

Recently, Paul Larson, an equities strategist with Morningstar, had described seven ways in which his investment strategy differs from the conventional wisdom and academia ("Seven Different Investing Perspectives"). If I were to make such a list myself, it would look identical to the one compiled by Paul Larson. Brief version of his "seven investing perspectives" is included below.

1. Focus on the next decade, not the next quarter.

Most Wall Street analysts who publish research for public consumption spend a lot of their energy focusing on near-term tax rates, weekly inventory trends, and so on, which really do not matter in the long term.

The army of analysts on Wall Street are then serving an exploding number of hedge funds, entities whose investors demand performance - and demand it now - given the exorbitant fees usually being paid. Many hedge funds cannot afford to think about the long term, because if they suffer even a little in the short term, they might not be around for the long term.

Luckily, those willing and able to take a long-term perspective can gain an edge in this short-term-focused world, and that's exactly what I and our analysts do here at Morningstar. We spend a lot of our time thinking about where a company is going to be many years from now, because this is what drives intrinsic value. We try to minimize the short-term noise to pick out the secular trends that will really matter.

2. Price volatility does not equal risk.

If you go to business school, you are likely to be taught that risk in the stock market can be defined as the historical volatility in a stock's price. Risk is usually thought of and measured in terms of beta, a statistical measure that represents a stock's past volatility relative to an index. Frankly, I just do not understand the relevance of beta when thinking about ways I might lose money. Not only is it backward-looking, but its conne