Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Downside of Limit Orders; Seeing the Big Picture - "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator"

Continuing the series of quotes from Edwin Lefevre's "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator." This part describes main character's experience with the limit orders and why he doesn't believe in using them anymore.

This piece is still applicable even today, in the world of electronic trading. When prices are moving quickly and the market is volatile, there is often no use in trying to get "the" price and you're often better off just running with the market price to establish or exit the position you are in.

"Everything happened as I had foreseen. I was dead right and I lost every cent I had! I was wiped out by something that was unusual. If the unusual never happened there would be no difference in people and then there wouldn't be any fun in life. The game would become merely a matter of addition and subtraction. It would make of us a race of bookkeepers with plodding minds. It's the guessing that develops a man's brain power. Just consider what you have to do to guess right.

The ticker beat me by lagging so far behind the market. I was accustomed to regarding the tape as the best little friend I had because I bet according to what it told me. But this time the tape double-crossed me. The divergence between the printed and the actual prices undid me.

I did worse than not see it; I kept on trading, in and out, regardless of the execution. You see, I never could trade with a limit. I must take my chances with the market. That is what I am trying to beat the market, not the particular price. When I think I should sell, I sell. When I think stocks will go up, I buy. My adherence to that general principle of speculation saved me.

Whenever I did try to limit the prices in order to minimize the disadvantages of trading at the market when the ticker lagged, I simply found that the market got away from me. This happened so often that I stopped trying. I can't tell you how it came to take me so many years to learn that instead of placing piking bets on what the next few quotations were going to be, my game was to anticipate what was going to happen in a big way."

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Lessons Applicable to Any Investor - "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator"

I've recently read a very curious book about the stock market. Based on my previous posts you would have thought that it's either a Buffett's or a Benjamin Graham's book about value investing. Wrong. The name of the book is "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator" and it was written by Edwin Lefevre eighty-five years ago. Naturally, one would wonder how is reading about a stock speculator that lived in the beginning of the last century applicable to the value investing strategy. Well, it may not be, but I found it very interesting nevertheless and would recommend it to anyone interested in the stock market regardless of the investing strategy.

As I started learning about investments, I considered myself a long-term value investor. The first books that I've read were about Warren Buffett and Philip Fisher, who are two of the most well-known and influential value investors. Then I stumbled upon this book as I was perusing through Amazon.com's investment-related books. This book tells a story of a stock speculator who started out from scratch and became one of the best-known traders of his time. I found his principles and insights quite valuable. I will share some of the highlights of this book through a series of posts.

One of the reasons why I found this book so valuable is that it helps to understand and define my own investment strategy. As many investors and traders often state - more important that any particular strategy is finding the one that suits you best and the one that you will have absolute confidence in. This books helps me, for example, understand that Buffett's strategy doesn't suit me 100% while the constant trading probably will not suit me either. At this point, I see myself somewhere in between the Buffett/Graham and Jesse Livermore (trader whose story is told in the aforementioned book) camps of thought. I liked how Livermore stated in the middle of the book that a whole lot more money was made sitting tight and doing nothing than trading in and out. In my opinion, that already makes him more than a regular run of the mill trader,

Please see below are general stock market/trading related excerpts from the book. Future excerpts will be more topic-specific.

"Another lesson I learned early is that there is nothing new in Wall Street. There can't be because speculation is as old as the hills. Whatever happens in the stock market to-day has happened before and will happen again.

Of course there is always a reason for fluctuations, but the tape does not concern itself with the why and wherefore. It doesn't go into explanations. I didn't ask the tape why when I was fourteen, and I don't ask it to-day, at forty. The reason for what a certain stock does to-day may not be known for two or three days, or weeks, or months. But what the dickens does that matter? Your business with the tape is now not tomorrow. The reason can wait. But you must act instantly or be left.

It takes a man a long time to learn all the lessons of all his mistakes. They say there are two sides to everything. But there is only one side to the stock market; and it is not the bull side or the bear side, but the right side. It took me longer to get that general principle fixed firmly in my mind than it did most of the more technical phases of the game of stock speculation. I have heard of people who amuse themselves conducting imaginary operations in the stock market to prove with imaginary dollars how right they are. Sometimes these ghost gamblers make millions. It is very easy to be a plunger that way.

With me I must back my opinions with my money. My losses have taught me that I must not begin to advance until I am sure I shall not have to retreat. But if I cannot advance I do not move at all. I do not mean by this that a man should not limit his losses when he is wrong. He should. But that should not breed indecision. All my life I have made mistakes, but in losing money I have gained experience and accumulated a lot of valuable don'ts. I have been flat broke several times, but my loss has never been a total loss. Otherwise, I wouldn't be here now. I always knew I would have another chance and that I would not make the same mistake a second time. I believed in myself.

A man must believe in himself and his judgment if he expects to make a living at this game. That is why I don't believe in tips. If I buy stocks on Smith's tip I must sell those same stocks on Smith's tip. I am depending on him. Suppose Smith is away on a holiday when the selling time comes around? No, sir, nobody can make big money on what someone else tells him to do. I know from experience that nobody can give me a tip or a series of tips that will make more money for me than my own judgment. It took me five years to learn to play the game intelligently enough to make big money when I was right.

I didn't have as many interesting experiences as you might imagine. I mean, the process of learning how to speculate does not seem very dramatic at this distance. I went broke several times, and that is never pleasant, but the way I lost money is the way everybody loses money who loses money in Wall Street. Speculation is a hard and trying business, and a speculator must be on the job all the time or he'll soon have no job to be on.

If somebody had told me my method would not work I nevertheless would have tried it out to make sure for myself, for when I am wrong only one thing convinces me of it, and that is, to lose money. And I am only right when I make money. That is speculating.

I have always played a lone hand. I began that way in the bucket shops and have kept it up. It is the way my mind works. I have to do my own seeing and my own thinking. But I can tell you after the market began to go my way I felt for the first time in my life that I had allies the strongest and truest in the world: underlying conditions. They were helping me with all their might. Perhaps they were a trifle slow at times in bringing up the reserves, but they were dependable, provided I did not get too impatient. I was not pitting my tape-reading knack or my hunches against chance. The inexorable logic of events was making money for me.

The thing was to be right; to know it and to act accordingly.

When it comes to selling stocks, it is plain that nobody can sell unless somebody wants those stocks. If you operate on a large scale you will have to bear that in mind all the time. A man studies conditions, plans his operations carefully and proceeds to act. He swings a pretty fair line and he accumulates a big profit on paper. Well, that man can't sell at will. You can't expect the market to absorb fifty thousand shares of one stock as easily as it does one hundred. He will have to wait until he has a market there to take it. There comes the time when he thinks the requisite buying power is there. When that opportunity comes he must seize it. As a rule he will have been waiting for it. He has to sell when he can, not when he wants to. To learn the time, he has to watch and test. It is no trick to tell when the market can take what you give it. But in starting a movement it is unwise to take on your full line unless you are convinced that conditions are exactly right.

Remember that stocks are never too high for you to begin buying or too low to begin selling. But after the initial transaction, don't make a second unless the first shows you a profit. Wait and watch. That is where your tape reading conies in to enable you to decide as to the proper time for beginning. Much depends upon beginning at exactly the right time. It took me years to realize the importance of this. It also cost me some hundreds of thousands of dollars."

Saturday, September 20, 2008

"Lessons from the Lost Decade in Stocks" and My Take On It

Morningstar has recently published an interesting article titled "Lessons from the Lost Decade in Stocks," which I'd like to provide my opinion on. The article points out that during the past 10 years overall stock market gains have been negligible, if not negative, after you account for the transaction costs and tax expenses. It then goes on to list several lessons that we can learn from this period. Below I will address each lesson (please see the article to read Morningstar's lessons in full).

  • Lesson One: The long haul may be longer than you think. I would certainly agree with this statement since after this "lost" decade we can clearly see that long-term outlook may be longer than you'd expect depending on the market conditions when you started investing. For example, if you have started investing in the market at the peak of the dot-com boom in 1999, you would need to have a substantially longer outlook for your investments to pay off than for someone who had started investing in 2002 or 2008 since it will take much longer to see returns on investments that were bought at the peak of the market.


  • Lesson Two: Diversification is your friend. This one is tricky since diversification can be your friend if you do it right or your enemy if you go overboard with it. The article is suggesting that investors that spread their money over different sectors, market caps, styles, and geographic exposures will fare better than investors sticking to a particular market niche. While I would agree that it's a risky proposition to be in just small-caps or just large-caps or in just the domestic market, I would also argue that you have to be weary of over-diversification. If you spread your investments over all the different market sectors, caps, and geographic regions you're bound to perform close to the market average. Another problem with diversifying your investments too much is that it becomes significantly more difficult to keep track of all the areas that you're invested in. If you're invested all over the board, you're less likely to have a good handle on the market conditions and to know when you should get out of a particular market. I believe that diversification works best when investments are spread over a handful of carefully researched market niches (be it gold, Latin America, or large-caps).


  • Lesson Three: Dollar-cost averaging is your other friend. I agree with this statement as far as it applies to the mutual funds since you don't incur any transactional costs by buying mutual fund shares in smaller pieces over time. With stocks, though, it's a different story. Although it is not wise to purchase all of your intended stocks of a Company A at once, it also doesn't make sense to buy several shares of it on a monthly basis since the commission fees will more than offset any benefit you may receive from using the dollar-cost averaging technique.


  • Lesson Four: Save more. I wouldn't say this lesson is anymore important now than in any other time since it is always important to save as much as reasonably possible. The only other thing that I would add is that people need to make sure that they are saving in the most efficient way possible. For example, if you're already maxing out your employer's match in the 401(k) account, you should start investing in the Roth IRA before you start contributing to the Traditional IRA. The reason for doing so is to hedge your tax position in the future. Contributions to both, 401(k) and Traditional IRA accounts, are done on a pre-tax basis while Roth IRA contributions are your after-tax money. When you retire you are likely to get the most benefit tax-wise by using a combination of pre-tax and after-tax withdrawals.


  • Lesson Five: Minimize expenses and taxes. Essentially, this means staying away from loaded funds that are usually more expensive than no-load funds. Also, if you're investing into mutual funds with a high annual capital gains exposure, you'd be better off using those mutual funds in your pre-tax retirement accounts (such as 401(k) and Traditional IRA).


  • Lesson Six: The past isn't always prologue. This is another way of saying that market's performance in the past decade isn't a good indicator of how it will perform in the next decade. At the same time, you can look back into the market history and see that this isn't the first time that a "lost decade" has descended upon the market and that it is usually followed by a long bull market. Let's hope that pattern still stands.